Bloody shovel

Don't call it a spade


So, a 22 year old Arab dork,


born and raised in England, who probably grew up obsessed by all those scantily-clad white girls all around him who wouldn’t give him the time of day. One day he suddenly “radicalized”, became a hard-core Salafist, made some Salafist buddies who took them to the Middle East to train as a ghazi. He found his call.

And what he do with his call? He bombed an Ariana Grande concert. Of all places.

Now why would that be? What is it he disliked or resented about hundreds upon hundreds of teenage girls in short skirts?


These links may help.



38 responses to “Manchester

  1. Pingback: Manchester | @the_arv

  2. Dark Reformation101 May 24, 2017 at 15:39

    Bin Laden, when he was a teenager, got into a fight with his family when they were listening to an Arabic pop song in the care.

    Muhammad Atta told his female Phd (or Masters) adviser that he did not want to see her again because he cannot stand to be around women.

    Sex is one way to punk these people.

    One tactic, that could be used if the conditions called for it, would be to make music videos of a semi pornographic nature involving Muslim women wearing Burkas who then strip into bikinis. Etc Etc Etc.

  3. Dividualist May 24, 2017 at 15:42

    The more and more I think about it the more correct this thesis sounds. We already have a very well studied track record of how cults hunt for losers. I’ve been to a Scientology meeting, saw it. We also have a well studied track record of losers going postal. Both mechanisms are fairly well understood. Radical Salafism is a cult that explicitly wants many of their recruits going postal on us. So it is these three things coming together and we already have a ton of research about the first two elements, we just need to link them. There is also a fourth element, namely why does a boy raised in England think Radical Salafism is just his thing, instead of, say, Scientology or the many other cults for loser. In other words, why didn’t all that upbringing change him, why did he still think his racial heritage predestines him for that. I think the main reason is that the West lost its identitfy. So we are not pushing any identity on schoolboys, hence as normal humans need an identity they cling to whatever their grandparents used to have. While whites make them all kinds of bullshit subcultural identities, from goth to gamer.

    There is one last thing I don’t understand: how comes these boys don’t think their parents suck and stuff their parents do sucks? Why don’t they rebel against parents? Why don’t they think Islam sucks precise because dad, that boring old man, is into it? How comes they actually get respect from their kids and a willingness to continue family tradition? I mean, their dad is driving a taxi. Not high status, not even with the added Prog boost. And high status Hollywood stars aren’t that often into Islam. The logical thing for a status hungry boy is to be a secular liberal. How comes they don’t despise their parents religious conservatives the same way the sons of white Christians do?

    • spandrell May 24, 2017 at 16:39

      Don’t say my thesis is correct because you obviously aren’t understanding what I’m saying. These guys aren’t lacking “an identity” nor any abstract bullshit concept like that. These kids are lacking pussy. They are lacking the gangsta life that it’s sold to them all the time and they would really much like to have. But what they really get is to be a dork incel in a lousy job, walking over eggs in order to not offend their feminist overlords.

      These kids are already rebelling against their parents. None of their parents are Salafist. If they were their sons would have married a cousin by age 18. Their fathers are moderate crap who won’t stand up as real gangsta men against their annoying mothers, so the kids rebel against them by doing the cool thing and joining the jihad.

      • jamienyc May 24, 2017 at 23:03

        Spot on. The main article too.

        Why is that singer’s last name Grande – she is quite flat-chested. Serena Grandi, on the other hand…

        • spandrell May 24, 2017 at 23:42

          Surnames come from fathers.

          • parisian May 26, 2017 at 01:35

            What the fuck does it matter about this cunt’s tits? Or her ‘music’ either? First time I didn’t listen to the music and sound before the politics was exploded first. Bitch is ‘pro-Islam’, who’d listen to her now, except the other people who forgave Mohammed even FASTER this time than ever before (the English are MUCH worse than the French this way, nation of goddam gerbils and hamsters by now), and that’s the only reason it’s not a tragedy that the simple fans took the fall for her (although it’s plenty tragic that they did too.) Dumbass harebrain is ‘just so sorry’, and says nothing about evil Islam. If she had big tits it wouldn’t matter either if she’s this dumb. And she’ll get over being ‘broken’, will use it for her career. Go have an affair with that stupid lesbian Kristen Stewart, who’s on her 3rd cunnilingus affair already and can’t act. Then Natalie Portman, who just lies about everything she does. They’ll all get together on Oprah who, as we all know, is still fighting morbid obesity even after her coolly pointillistic ‘star turn’ in ‘Selma’, which falsified Lyndon Johnson’s legacy. After Dowd wrote that up, Obama had Oprah and the director over to the White House so they could hold hands and watch ‘Selma’ again. So sweet. Milo was definitely good on this Ariana slut, though. Superb irony, because she LOVED the attack. Nobody in Paris or Nice LOVED it. So this is a new twist, with this kewpie-doll SLUT thrilled about the Streisand Effect the attacks have given her career. But acts 12 years old.

            • parisian May 26, 2017 at 01:43

              I wouldn’t be surprised if this didn’t give Mouse Corbyn yet another boost, the English are by now so pathetic, and some still think they have ‘Empire’ (what? Tristan da Cunha and the Falklands? even France has much more). English so perverted by now they’ll think Corbyn’s Islam-sucking is going to improve their country. May still well in lead, but all bets are off after none of the polls have been right in the recent year. If Corbyn wins, it’s definitely a form of ‘end of the world’.

            • Garr May 26, 2017 at 02:23

              See below — my reply to you was misplaced.

            • spandrell May 26, 2017 at 02:44

              Dude, you’re gonna calm down, and limit your comments to 5 lines maximum, or I’m gonna ban you for your own good.

      • barnyardboss May 25, 2017 at 02:25

        good stuff here. thanks.

      • Dividualist May 26, 2017 at 15:46

        I do, I just didn’t express myself well. Turn back the clock 100 years. Any Arab kid gets more status hence more pussy the more he Westernizes himself – think something like when Gandhi was a lawyer in London. any Hindu father wants his daughter to marry that, because he is on the right track to the status and power Westerners have and they not.

        What is the difference between 1906 and 2017? The West still has many elements of that status, like power, money and global influence. At the end of the day the West is still exerting a global dominance.

        So why don’t third-world kids get now more status hence pussy from Westernizing? Because the West stopped believing in itself, does not have an identity anymore and the usual self-hating Cathedral stuff.

        This is what I mean under identity. The boy knows that he conglomerate that can be roughly understood as Westminster, White House, Google, World Bank, Barclays, CNN, BBC and so on – the modern West – still has the most money and power in the world hence most status, hence joining this and trying to go high would get him pussy. But this conglomerate no longer has an identity. Struck with self-hatred, self-doubt, it no longer says “yes join me because I am the best”.

        • spandrell May 26, 2017 at 16:16

          So why don’t third-world kids get now more status hence pussy from Westernizing?

          Because Feminism happened. That’s why. The Westerners aren’t getting that much pussy either. And to the extent that they do, the woman is boss. An arab kid who has grown up seeing his father having balls and his mother being obedient isn’t going to feel good under the 21st century western arrangement. Only a minority of alphas is getting the good pussy, and that is what Arabs wanna do, which is why they dress like American black rappers.

          See, it’s much easier than “we lost our identity”, “the West has lost its spirit”. We are talking 80 IQ Arab boys here. Motivations are simple.

  4. Pingback: Manchester | Reaction Times

  5. Cavalier May 24, 2017 at 21:59

    Cutting as always.

    P.S. Your previous tagline was superior.

    • Garr May 26, 2017 at 02:29

      Here I’m afraid of the host; at Jim’s I’m afraid of the commenters. (I’m actually afraid of being literally shot by Jim’s commenters. Did you see that article linked at Drudge about the neo-Nazi-turned-Muslim who shot two of his neo-Nazi apartment-mates to death? His picture — skinny intense-looking 20-year-old — made me think, “Hunh, is this what ‘Anonymous’ looks like?” Viking with his Idaho militia, enraged at his Prospect Heights tenants for not being able to make shelves …)

  6. R7 Rocket May 25, 2017 at 02:36

    That’s why the God-Emperor called them “Losers.”

  7. Thales May 25, 2017 at 14:01

    Omega male rage.

  8. Tony Denton May 25, 2017 at 22:50

    What a body on that shirtless guy!

  9. Garr May 26, 2017 at 02:21

    My current speculation is that the West-European ruling class will “accept” Islam and then feel that they have the moral authority to ruthlessly crush “radicalism”, following the Egyptian example but much more competently. Jim thinks that this would Stop Science but I’m not so sure. They’d still be West Europeans. It wouldn’t Stop Art because Art’s already dead anyway. It might result in cool new architecture.
    Heard Exile yet? I was thinking that maybe there’s just sort of an old-timey-gospel pattern that you can master if you’re as clever as Keith Richards is, and then you can just generate variations within that pattern almost automatically and they all sound perfect. Is that how it is?

    • Garr May 26, 2017 at 02:22

      Oh, this was for Parisian. Sorry, Spandrell. My computer crashed and then when it came up again my comment was relegated to the general category rather than kept as a reply to him.

    • spandrell May 26, 2017 at 02:44

      There’s a fundamental demographic problem that even mass conversion wouldn’t solve.

    • parisian May 26, 2017 at 03:04

      No, I haven’t. If you want to talk to me, I think Spandrell can see me email. Enjoyed your stuff at Jim’s, but just now, trying to answer you, was told to ‘calm down’ and ‘limit to 5 lines’, or get banned, so I can’t answer you. It’s his blog.

      • parisian May 26, 2017 at 17:09

        Garr–just a final word, since I’ve been banned (preferable, since I won’t be tempted further–the host is not scary like the others, just tough: It IS ‘for my own good’). Am not interested in your ‘old-timey-gospel’ and don’t think your question made any sense at all. I have no reason to listen to this album now and did not like you implications, you’re a rookie, I’m an outsider, but you should not get so off-topic all over the place.

  10. mitchellporter May 26, 2017 at 05:37

    Don’t lose sight of the politics and geopolitics at work here. These people weren’t random immigrants. They were political opponents of Gaddafi who were permitted to settle in Britain. That they taught their kids to memorize the Quran tells you they were probably Islamists rather than liberals.

    The secret services of Britain, like those of every great power, cultivate, host, and support foreign politicals who they think could be useful. This is simple blowback from using these people and then screwing them over – in this case, using Islamists to topple Gaddafi, and then going to war against them in Syria.

  11. Alfred Woenselaer May 27, 2017 at 21:59

    An internet commenter observed that the first picture is strange. The shade on the left 3 men shows the sun on the left, the shade on suicide man shows the sun on the right. Seems photoshopped.

  12. Pingback: This Week In Reaction (2017/05/28) - Social Matter

  13. glosoli June 18, 2017 at 00:02


    The photo of the supposed bomber on the supposed beach you share above, you may want to look at the shadow from the sun on the other three guys, versus the shadow from the (2nd) sun on our boy. Poor photoshopping eh?

    A little bit of youtube research reveals much about Manchester that indicates fake, pure fake.

    • spandrell June 18, 2017 at 00:50

      So what’s the prevalent theory?

      • glosoli June 20, 2017 at 15:34

        There isn’t a prevalent theory of which I’m aware.
        It seems to me to be a good excuse for governments to move towards more internet control, clamp down on anything they deem to be *extremists* (us lot).
        My own theory: We’re heading into economic collapse, like the 30s, they need a distraction, so Islam is it. They will foment civil commotion in Europe/UK/US and war in the Middle East. Wars make them money.
        There’s more to it than that, as I think it all fits in with Biblical prophesies too.
        Get your gold now, and food etc.
        A mini ice-age will merely add to the interesting times that are now unfolding.

Please comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s