Bloody shovel

Don't call it a spade

Islam or the Rule of the Ugly

You might remember this post; about how Islam is getting traction among middle-ages and unattractive women in general. We may call is aiskhrocracy, the rule of the ugly.

Well, don’t take my word for it. Take the Huffington Post’s.

Screenshot 2017-05-16 23.49.13.png

The argument? Quite simple:

Hip Feminist campaigns like Free the Nipple only encourage a gullible behavior of disrespect for our own bodies, leading to everyone else around us disrespecting our bodies as well. If we want to be respected as women and taken seriously in all our endeavors we should look to a new source; Muslim women. Muslim women, as well as Muslim men, see every body as a sacred temple, especially the female body. Opposed to exposing themselves, it is through modesty. When we think of modern feminists we should stray away from the new American trends and start looking to what we have always thought as a contradiction; Muslim feminists.


For me, this idea especially showcases feminism in America. With all of the pressures in our American society to have a certain physical allure; to have long, luscious hair, a skinny yet curvy body, flawless facial beauty, woman go through hell. With this, we succumb to the pressures that we generally think we are free of; we oppress our natural womanhood with constant worry about how we look to others around us. We do not have the courage to stand up to this societal critique and say ‘my body is not to be ogled at’.

Is that so, Gabby. Actually I’m very sympathetic. I do agree that Western women show too much skin. Way too much. And Femen-style feminists are plain insane.


Well, you can’t eat the cake and have it too. Where’s your hijab Gabby? And, you know, maybe your brothers didn’t tell you, but as a man I can inform you that men don’t ogle only at the body. The face is quite important too. Yours doesn’t look too bad, and those two veil-clad girls on the picture in the article; they look pretty damn good. Very ogle-worthy. I’m not sure I could stop myself oggling them if I saw them.

So let us be coherent and faithful and follow the wisdom of this religion of yours, and go the extra mile. Put on your damn burka. And as far as possible, stay home. Then you can talk.


14 responses to “Islam or the Rule of the Ugly

  1. under the rose May 16, 2017 at 23:09

    Why isn’t mind-moving an adjective in the English language?

    I don’t want to use any other for this journalist’s, hem, visage.

    When will I learn the manner of true alphas and say something like doesn’t look too bad?

    I can inform you that men don’t ogle only at the body. The face is quite important too.

    Betas like me care mainly for the face, but probably she was writing with alphas on her mind

    • under the rose May 16, 2017 at 23:25

      What a champion of verbal manipulation she is, by the way. Each words speaks two lies.
      What’s unsettling is to think the bulk of readers/people want to be deceived this way.

  2. Pingback: Islam or the Rule of the Ugly | @the_arv

  3. rcglinski May 16, 2017 at 23:36

    Let us always remember Steve Sailer’s First Law of Female Journalism: The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.

    • spandrell May 17, 2017 at 00:16

      The most accurate formulation would be “will be considered relatively high-status”. A hijab doesn’t make anybody hotter-looking. She’d know, she isn’t wearing one now.

      • parisian May 17, 2017 at 02:39

        Your beauty contests are great. We are almost to the burkini season again, but I don’t know how much they’ll enforce it. Wearing too many clothes is disgraceful and, just as the French said last year, unhygienic. I didn’t even read the bitch’s article, but I think it’s polite the way you ogle at some of them. I still can’t get that dyke Weidel out of my mind. I think her behaviour is subversive and criminal, because she’s the only type I think of naked immediately–that SKIN. These are ‘sweet-looking’, though. I don’t know how you find them ogle-able though.

        • Inquiring Mind May 17, 2017 at 03:12

          Ah, Ms. Weidel.

          There are certain, shall we say, subversive aspects to German sexual expression. There was a picture somewhere of a woman in leather to which my mom once remarked, in the concerned maternal tone that a son of hers must be properly warned, “Die Stiefel Frau — that woman is very wicked!”

          In relating this episode, I tried explaining to an ethnic-Polish (i.e. once removed from the insider’s view of German culture) male co-worker, known for maintaining a rather transparent fiction about being closeted by decorating his office with pictures of “mature” Hollywood women showing a lot of skin, who the “boot lady” according to the literal translation is supposed to be (as in the leg-hugging boots with the spike heels of the leather outfit) and suggested, “Dominatrix.” “Ohhhh!” was his reply.

          Yes, those two scarf-clad young women are all sweetness and innocence whereas the only thought that can come to mind upon seeing Ms. Weidel is, “Hurt me . . . Please, please, hurt me!”

          • parisian May 17, 2017 at 06:57

            All most sublime, tight and clever, your excellency (loved ‘maintaining a rather transparent fiction about being closeted’), except not ‘the only thought’, even though that was required for a good writing. That’s for your Pole and many fashion-layout and designer-panseys–but they’re the ones that have the MONEY. But she’s got lots more potential than a narrow leather scene. Since I don’t find many women attractive, I do know that I never fantasized her in leather and boots, but rather only obscene and shameless showing her tropical flesh like the closet voluptuary she is–could be very Italianate with still the hard German lines so wouldn’t look floozie after being worked over. Very hard to get to that point because she was born to shit-test ruthlessly, it’s even built-in by her retarded lesbian act–so schoolgirl, and will end up ‘old maid pervert’. So would require of any man that he subdue her, probably somewhat sedate her (or a good bit), and maybe even tie her up, because who cares about some lesbian’s pleasure. She’d go right back to work, furious at being fulfilled. But too gifted physically for Dominatrix, those are a dime a dozen; this one just oozes pleasure for the male.

            But maybe back in Germany, she’ll discipline the Muslims for the moment, but I think that’s overrated and overstating things. She’s purely interested in power, but might fight this ‘rule of the ugly’, at least while she’s still young.

  4. Pingback: Islam or the Rule of the Ugly | Reaction Times

  5. Dirtnapninja May 17, 2017 at 03:27

    Keep in mind that western converts to islam have something akin to a 75% apostasy rate.

    There are three types of white converts to islam. Firstly are those who convert through marriage.,mainly women. Then there are the social justice types who are converting to islam because it gives them improved victim karma. Again, mainly women. The final sort are alienated gamma personalities who convert to islam because it gives them an instant community of friends and associates and protection from bullying. These are almost always men.

    Now, there are a small number of stable personalities who do convert out of genuine conviction, but they are far outnumbered by the others. These types rarely become fanatics, and are often quite moderate.

    The gamma males and social justice OTOH converts are utter poison. Their narcissism and personality defects are guaranteed to wreak total and utter havoc in the muslim community. It is from these types that you also get the radical converts who become terrorists.

    • snorlaxwp May 17, 2017 at 04:43

      wreak total and utter havoc in the muslim community.

      How would they do that? Stick figure Muhammad? Objections to man+goat+bacha bazi+12yo niece pairings?

    • danielchieh May 17, 2017 at 05:46

      I don’t know, from what I see, its the stable converts that are the most fanatical. They are often tradition seeking men and women who have identified Islam as the best vehicle to express their views. While short of being -violent-, their conviction would make any member of the Westboro Baptist Church proud.

    • spandrell May 17, 2017 at 09:25

      Got any stats on that?

  6. Pingback: Eurabia: It Is Closer Than You Think. – IMPERIAL ENERGY

Please comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s