Bloody shovel

Don't call it a spade

Why bureaucratic control is a good thing

Foseti made himself a name by blogging about his experience as a high level civil servant in Washington. He explains in very clear terms how the bureaucracy works, and to what extent it actually rules the country. He doesn’t say if that’s a good or bad thing. But the common first reaction is outrage. Our elected representatives don’t enact laws?! What about democracy?  Oh wait. Democracy sucks. We are all agreed on that. So less control by elected bodies must surely be a good thing then?

Pretty much. As a prove, and referring to my last post, see how Viviane Reding, a Luxembourgish eurocrat  is pushing for the right to be forgotten. Namely that any content uploaded to an online service must be deleted (not pulled from public view) by request of the author. That means no more compromising Facebook pictures, gotchas about Twitter racist comments, etc. Such a law would protect any real dissenter from being cyber-bullied by the Cathedral and its mobs.

Of course the Anglo media, that bunch of sellouts, cries bloody murder. Scroll down and see how the media is describing the proposed law.

Telegraph: “EU ‘asking Google to censor web

WSJ: “E.U. is ‘Biggest Threat to Free Speech on the Internet’

New Republic: “A Grave New Threat to Free Speech From Europe

The argument being that would mean forcing Google to remove all personal information by request. And that’s a bad thing.

Is it? Cyber stalking is a human right now? The fact that the US is heavily invested in the whole new “social media”, which is little else than a huge private data mining machine with surveillance rights to the USG. And that must be protected at all costs! Google spying on unwilling customers and posting the contents online is the American definition of Free Speech. Well Europe could certainly do with a First Amendment, as you can go to jail by saying that Blacks or Arabs don’t belong in here. But the travesty of the Anglo media defending the Facebook/Google stalking machine is even worse. As it is, the US is a puppet of its big business. The EU is not, and the eurocrats at Brussels seem to enjoy routinely screwing with big American companies, c.f. forcing Microsoft to delete Internet Explorer from Windows.

That’s what a government is supposed to do. Assert its power. Sovereignty means little when some all your media and political establishment sell themselves cheap. Viviane Reding on the other hand doesn’t need campaign contributions. So she can do some good.


[typo edited. Mondays, you know]

4 responses to “Why bureaucratic control is a good thing

  1. Vladimir February 20, 2012 at 20:12

    Well Europe could certainly do with a Second Amendment, as you can go to jail by saying…

    You mean First Amendment? But more importantly, I see two big problems with your analysis.

    First, you cherry-pick one example where the eurocrats are pushing for something decent and humane. But what about the average results of their rule? You sound like some commie making general praise of the U.S.S.R. and justifying it by its improvements in sanitation.

    Second, the idea that “the US is a puppet of its big business” is just wacky. Again you take the example of a few companies that enjoy great favor with the establishment and extrapolate to all big business. In reality, there’s no essential difference between the USG’s permanent bureaucracy and the eurocrats (which are in any case just an overseas outpost of the same Cathedral).

    You do point out an interesting case where different organs of the Cathedral have an inconsistent view towards certain big businesses that generally enjoy great favor with its establishment. I’m not sure I have a definite explanation for it myself. But your theory is certainly too simplistic.

    • spandrell February 20, 2012 at 20:21

      Fixed the typo, thanks for pointing it out.

      Of course the analysis is too simplistic. I just wanted to make a quick point.
      The eurocrats are completely insulated and can regulate as they please. The US still has to run the election circus every 2 years, which gives the usurers and big business a big hand. See how the Eurocrats routinely threaten to dismantle the rating agencies. Or the Tobin tax. All that is unthinkable in the Cathedral’s American HQ. So the EU isn’t doing too shabby for a satellite outpost.
      Of course the core diversity cult problem remains here. But we’ll see.

  2. Pseudo-chrysostom August 17, 2016 at 06:59

    >Of course the core diversity cult problem remains here. But we’ll see.

    As we have seen.

  3. spandrell August 17, 2016 at 09:03

    Indeed. Hey, I was young.

Please comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s